Over the bank holiday weekend I finally finished Mona Eltahawy’s
treatise of misogyny in the Arab world. The issues comprised in her chapters
dominate headlines every week implicitly and explicitly. As a follow up to her
immensely controversial Foreign Policy
article, it is sobering, shocking yet insightful mixture of fact and fury
that highlights several of the struggles faced by women in the Middle East and
North Africa region in a ‘post-Arab Spring’ era. Being Egyptian herself, many of
testimonies from women and girls throughout the region explain the
extraordinary way the Egyptian Arab Spring actually managed to further oppress
women. In the book she comprehensively outlines the statistics and implications
of several key issues facing Arab women today including FGM, child marriage,
domestic abuse, street harassment and sexual assault. In doing so she paints a
picture of women’s rights in the Arab world as a fairly dismal affair but
coupled with stories of progress and calls for revolution it makes a compelling
and rousing read.
One of criticisms of Eltahawy’s book has been that it makes
several vast generalisations about the ‘Arab region’ based on her experience of
Egyptian politics and this is perhaps one of its few flaws. Having said that
her comparisons between those at vastly different ends of the poverty (Yemen,
Saudi Arabia for example) or religious extremist (Qatar and Lebanon) spectrum
clearly demonstrate her point that the common denominator here is not wealth,
poverty or interpretations of Islam but in fact what unites Arab states is
patriarchy. Those who have ‘judged a book by its cover’ will also critique her
presumed Western arrogance in assuming she is denouncing the region for its
cultural barbarity. In reality, the book actually contains one of the best
handlings of the cultural relativism argument I have read to date. Her claim
that she maintains the right to criticise her culture in ways she would reject
from others allows her to resist reinforcing Western racism and arrogance
surrounding women’s rights whilst simultaneously ensuring women’s dissent is
not silenced by the desire to resist this racism. This has been a problem
throughout history where women are silenced by their societies because they do
not wish to support enemy stereotypes. It is so important that these binaries
are deconstructed to tell women’s true experiences. This approach is probably
my favourite thing about the book. I also particularly like the way Eltahawy
explains that she refuses to call girls who have been through FGM or sexual
assault ‘victims’ and rather prefers the word ‘survivor’ because it implies
bravery and strength not victimhood.
Eltahawy writes ardently as she calls upon the Middle East to
personalise its insurgency and take the state/street revolution into its homes
and bedrooms. With this she is reaching to the heart of the original feminist
trope the - personal is political - and calling on the courage of young girls
to challenge centuries of traditional, religion and culture around their dining
room tables. My only worry is that this is easier said than done and whilst I
resist asking Eltahawy to ‘check her privilege’ the only pitfall of this book
is perhaps her lack of acknowledgement of her own wisdom, experience and
opportunity. Overall though, this is a must read for anyone interested in the
transnational feminist project and emancipating women and girls from outright
misogyny that remains veiled in religion and liberal cultural relativism.
No comments:
Post a Comment